In the middle of the chapter, he gave a handful of what you might call "randomly selected answers" to the question "what is the gospel?" (p. 18-19). After reading through all of them, I found myself wondering why certain people had used specific wording and why each had left seemingly important (to me, anyway) aspects of the gospel out...
"An emaciated gospel leads to emaciated worship." (p. 20)
For those of you reading together with us, here are some questions to ponder (and answer below if you'd like to... please also try to reference page numbers when applicable):
How did you feel about some of the answers that other people gave when answering the question "what is the gospel?"? Did any of them strike a chord with you? Any seem a bit off? Why?
What were you most excited about in the list of ways the book should help/change readers?
Any other take-aways from the first chapter?
For those of you who haven't joined in on reading together with us yet, it's definitely not too late! Grab a copy and get going! It's a short read; he's funny and easy to follow.
Next Wednesday, I'll be posting about Chapter 1.
No comments:
Post a Comment